🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed order, the highest judicial body cleared the way for Texas to use a revised congressional district plan that is projected to include several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's ruling that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and disrupting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in justifying its action.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters based on their race – a method known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries drawn after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Strong Dissent

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's ruling. She argued that it disrespected the work of the district court, noting that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's new map, with all its increased partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas voters, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared consistently, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision is part of a countrywide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican control. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

GOP lawmakers in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have pushed back with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas attorney general hailed the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he added.

Conversely, opposition party officials lamented the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A leading Democratic figure said the court had once again damaged its credibility by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.