🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – going beyond who would win citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in readership and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I was actually a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani led the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and his lead went from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for the former president last year backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. There was a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it before Trump endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, instance, the property owners and homeowners supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election we reported on if Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what New York represents in politics? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.