🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils will be cut by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that required municipal councils to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which can include multiple councillors depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities frequently devoted considerable time building local support and urging their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to put it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the current administration overturned the policy, stating local residents should decide whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The new legislation mandated councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results represented “a vital step in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has stated it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the public votes were divided down city-country divisions – most urban centers mandated to hold referendums supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish other types of wards – including countryside seats – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation suggested the administration was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This statement referred to the 17 regions that chose to keep their wards.